|
CHAPTER 19
ADDING OUR SAFEGUARDS
In eagerness to prevent violation of God's law, men have been
inclined to add safeguards to it. These attempts to reinforce
God's laws actually reflect on the wisdom of God for omitting
the safeguards in the first place. This aptitude for building
fences around the law showed early and stayed late.
To Adam God said, "You shall not eat." Evidently, Adam
passed this word on to his later formed wife. When Eve was questioned
by the serpent, she stated that they were neither to eat nor to
touch it. The prohibition against touching evidently was a safeguard
added to God's law. When their addition took the weight of law,
according to a Jewish story, the serpent seized upon it and, shoving
her into the tree, he caused Eve to touch the fruit. By showing
her that no ill effect came from touching it, she was convinced
easily that no harm would come from eating. Man's "safe course"
became a snare. This unfounded story raises a good point.
Where God urges us to be temperate in all things, we have been
heard to add, "Don't even touch some of these things."
As a safeguard against looking with lust, we are warned against
looking with desire. Though holy men "became all things to
all men," we are cautioned to "take the safe course"
and live in a Pharisaic island of aloofness. To trust others to
add self control is too risky; so we advise forsaking all that
"could lead to sin," as though that were possible. Rather
than exercising Christian liberty with a sympathetic eye for the
weak, we demand a surrender of the liberty. Since God exhorts
us not to forsake our assembling, we brace it up by adding, "Don't
ever miss one." To make certain that we give according to
our prosperity, we make it a duty to give at least a tithe.
In these points of illustration, we are adding safeguards to God's
law, building fences around the law to make it even more restrictive.
We affect a deeper piety than the Savior who turned water into
wine and feign a purity more sublime than that of the groom at
the wedding feast who had looked upon a woman with desire before
he married her.
We imply that Jesus was an accessory to sin in his first miracle
and that he was indiscreet in attending the party where his image
might be tarnished by the social drinking there. Our mildest implied
indictment against Jesus is that he did not "shun the appearance
of evil." He simply was not taking our "safe course."
And, though he "left us an example," we ought not to
walk in this one!
When we add our strictures to what we think to be God's law, we
constrict the gate and discourage others from entering. Our added
safeguards make Christianity impractical, for who can observe
all of our safety regulations? By our safeguards we add a yoke
to the legal yoke, and it does not make it any easier. When the
weak violate these, like Eve in the story, they are demoralized
toward keeping God's real law.
Before adding our restrictions to those of God, we should lend
an ear to Jesus' reprimand, "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites! because you shut the kingdom of heaven against men;
for you neither enter yourselves, nor allow those who would enter
to go in" (Matt. 23:1 3).
The Pharisees bound their safeguards with sincerity equal to ours.
They got a head start, but we are in the race!
 
|